Search

Home > Workers Comp Matters > What Stahl v. Hialeah Hospital Means for Florida’s Workers’ Compensation Laws


	Podcast:		Workers Comp Matters
	Episode:		What Stahl v. Hialeah Hospital Means for Florida’s Workers’ Compensation Laws
	Category:		Government & Organizations
	Duration:		00:29:54
	Publish Date:		2016-01-28 16:08:43
	Description:		In 1911, the U.S. created the first state-based workers’ compensation laws as a legislative solution between labor and management. In this “grand bargain,” employers provide compensation to employees injured on the job and in exchange employees don’t sue the employers for negligence. The current case of Stahl v. Hialeah Hospital questions whether Florida’s compensation laws still provide adequate remuneration to injured workers. What could this case really mean for Florida’s state legislature? In this episode of Workers Comp Matters, Alan Pierce interviews Mark Zientz, claimants' attorney for Stahl v. Hialeah, about the history of state workers’ compensation laws, legislative changes made in the 1970s, and the potential ramifications of three Florida cases pending at the appellate level. Together, they discuss contributory negligence vs. comparative negligence states and the creation of an OSHA commission to study the adequacy of workers’ compensation laws in the 1970s. Pierce and Zientz then move on to current cases in Florida, including Westphal v. St. Petersburg, Castellanos v. Next Door Company, and Stahl v. Hialeah Hospital. These cases question whether the compensation system is still an adequate replacement for the tort system which it supplanted. In other words, is workers’ compensation in Florida no longer constitutional? Special thanks to our sponsors, Casepacer and PInow.
	Total Play:		0