|
Description:
|
|
Several American cities have approved ballot measures in favor of taxing sugar-sweetened beverages. Public health expert Kristine Madsen of the University of California, Berkeley explains how smoking and a subsequent tobacco tax set a precedent for the more recent sugar-sweetened beverage taxes.
"So, tobacco and the taxes on tobacco are a great analogy when we’re just talking about something like sugar-sweetened beverages because it’s a luxury. It’s a little bit like a luxury tax on alcohol or cigarettes. That’s your choice – that’s fine, but clearly it should only happen occasionally."
There’s also the public perception – smoking is not considered as ‘cool’ as it used to be in popular ads and culture. Currently, that’s not the case with many sugar-sweetened beverages.
"You’ve got all these athletes who are doing it and so it looks cool, so I think that would be a huge win if there was a shift in the population away from thinking that was a good drink."
Madsen’s preliminary research has found that a ‘soda tax’ could have a really big impact on consumption. |