NutriMedical Report Show Friday July 26th 2019 – Hour Two – Harley Schlanger, LaRouchePAC.com, LaRouchePUB.com, Need for Trump Trade NOT War, Iran Dangers, Useless War No Benefit to USA West, Use Trade Financial Issues vs Iran Russia,

Harley Schlanger, LaRouchePAC.com, LaRouchePUB.com, Need for Trump Trade NOT War, Iran Dangers, Useless War No Benefit to USA West, Use Trade Financial Issues vs Iran Russia, Build With Allies Verification of NO URANIUM Nuke Enrichment, No Iran Missiles, Remove Nicaraguan Venezuelan Russian Nukes, Poised Russian Nukes if Iran Attack, Trump Wins 2020 if No War of Attacks, Allies Must Come On Side with On Ground Nuke Verification in Iran, China Trade with Remove North Korean Nukes,Dr Bill Deagle MD AAEM ACAM A4M, NutriMedical Report Show, www.NutriMedical.com, www.ClayandIRON.com, www.Deagle-Network.com,NutriMedical Report Show,

Bill — Below is the article I wrote on the Mueller Melt-down.

Best greetings, talk with you tonight,

Harley

ANTI-TRUMPERS IN SHOCK:

MUELLER TESTIMONY PROVES THERE IS NO CASE FOR TRUMP IMPEACHMENT

by: Harley Schlanger

July 26 — Anyone who watched the contorted and confused expressions on the face of former special counsel Robert Mueller during his testimony before two Congressional Committees on July 24, or heard his unsure, evasive, often-stumbling answers to questions, can now see why he had resisted making an appearance before Congress. Despite his resistance, Democratic Congressional leaders insisted he appear. Their purpose, in demanding that he testify, according to the anti-Trump {Washington Post} (WaPo), was to “give impeachment advocates fresh momentum.”

The consensus, following the spectacle, of all but the most hard-core promoters of the coup against the President — such as Reps. Schiff and Nadler, the two Committee chairs who presided over the hearings — is that his appearance, instead of invigorating the opposition to Trump, had been a catastrophe. This sentiment was summarized by WaPo reporter Dan Balz, who wrote that before the hearings, many Democrats considered Mueller a “potential savior”, who would serve as an agent of “Trump’s eventual undoing.” But the hearings, he concludes, “probably shattered those illusions once and for all,” making the prospects for impeachment “appear more remote.”

This view was shared by Harvard professor Laurence Tribe, a supporter of impeachment, who said the hearing “was a disaster. Far from breathing life into his damning report, the tired Robert Mueller sucked the life out of it.” Another anti-Trumper, filmmaker Michael Moore, described Mueller as a “frail old man, unable to remember things, stumbling, refusing to answer basic questions.” Barack Obama’s former chief strategist, David Axelrod, said watching the hearings was “very, very painful.”

The image created by establishment media of Mueller as a tough, honest prosecutor, a straight shooter who would spare no expense to get to the truth, while paying attention to the smallest details, was blown away by his performance. For example, when asked about Fusion GPS, the opposition research firm retained by the Clinton campaign, which hired former British spy Christopher Steele to fabricate a “dodgy dossier” against Trump — which was fraudulently used by the FBI to obtain a FISA warrant to surveil the Trump campaign — Mueller could only whisper, “I’m not familiar with that”! Famed civil liberties attorney Alan Dershowitz was one of several who, in commenting on that exchange, stated that it appears that Mueller not only did not write the report, but did not know what was in it!

The one partial Democratic victory seemingly came when Mueller, in the morning session before the Judiciary Committee, implied that had it not been for an opinion from the Justice Department’s Office of General Counsel that a sitting President cannot be indicted, Trump would have been indicted for obstruction. The victory celebration was short-lived, when he retracted that statement in the afternoon session. Despite the overall weakness of Mueller’s testimony, {Politico} reported that during a caucus meeting following the hearings, Rep. Nadler said that committee chairs could begin drafting articles of impeachment. He was rebuffed by House Speaker Pelosi, who dismissed his proposal as “premature.”