In this episode we first answer to some of the questions we received and then we move on to the main topic: how do you evaluate visualization? We have been discussing some contests in episode #2 and thought evaluation is really a key issue there.
Breakdown of the episode
[00:00] Intro [01:34] Listener question: Terms and conditions in competitions [03:46] Listener question: Connect research and practitioners [07:43] Listener question: How to stay objective about your own work? [10:23] Listener question: Do we criticize each other? [11:15] Listener question: How to introduce business people to benefits of visualization beyond Excel? [13:58] News: Visualizing sprint [15:54] News: Kartograph [19:40] SxSW Panel: Intent and Impact: How Visualization Makes a Change [21:36] Quality criteria and evaluating information visualizations: traditional academic approach [28:08] Evaluation beyond simple, clear-cut tasks [33:13] Enrico admits his secret love of David MacCandless [33:58] Andrew Vande Moere and Helen Purchase: On the role of design in information visualization [35:00] Truth and Beauty or: “I know it when I see it” [38:36] Data politics and importance of how the end product came about [40:36] Tamara Munzner’s nested model for visualization evaluation and design [44:25] Code of ethics [45:59] Wrap up and outlook
Links and images
Research papers mentioned in the episode
—
Have fun and, as usual, let us know what you think!