Search

Home > Opening Arguments > OA759: The "Socks" Case - Don't Take Legal Advice From Judicial Watch! (feat. Kel McClanahan)
Podcast: Opening Arguments
Episode:

OA759: The "Socks" Case - Don't Take Legal Advice From Judicial Watch! (feat. Kel McClanahan)
Category: News & Politics
Duration: 01:16:58
Publish Date: 2023-06-13 08:00:00
Description:

Republicans are saying that the "Clinton sock drawer case" - Judicial Watch v. NARA - means that Trump didn't violate the Espionage Act and can just declare anything he wants to be a "personal" record.

That's nonsense, of course.

Notes Judicial Watch, Inc. v. National Archives and Records Administration, 845 F.Supp.2d 288 (D.D.C.2012) https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=15818036517066124081

Donate to National Security Counselors! https://donate.democracyengine.com/NationalSecurityCounselors/contribute OR

https://www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted_button_id=QQY2ZQMWC6PX6

-Support us on Patreon at: patreon.com/law

-Follow us on Twitter:  @Openargs

-Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/openargs/

-For show-related questions, check out the Opening Arguments Wiki, which now has its own Twitter feed!  @oawiki

-And finally, remember that you can email us at openarguments@gmail.com
Total Play: 0