Search

Home > Circular Economy Podcast > Episode 70 – Customer Pain Points
Podcast: Circular Economy Podcast
Episode:

Episode 70 – Customer Pain Points
Category: Business
Duration: 00:24:38
Publish Date: 2022-01-16 00:01:00
Description:

Circular Economy Podcast Episode 70 Customer Pain Points

Catherine Weetman says: “Today’s episode is one of my regular round ups of the last 9 conversations. Today, I’ve chosen the theme of customer Pain Points. We’ll look at this from the perspective of both businesses, and citizens – you and me. I think some of those pain points are being overlooked by companies – that could be because they have a one-size-fits-all approach that might create value for one customer group, but doesn’t deliver, or could actually destroy value for another group.

I also think new pain points are cropping up – maybe even evolving. More of us are realising that our choices aren’t contributing to a fairer, healthier and more sustainable world, and that’s making us uncomfortable, at a conscious or a sub-conscious level. Knowing that we’re going to discard something because there isn’t a convenient way to help it be reused is also uncomfortable – and we’re finding that some of our assumptions are wrong.

For example, in Episode 69, Jo Godden of RubyMoon explained that in the UK, hardly any textiles are recycled. A small proportion is downcycled into wadding and seat fillings, some are exported for hand-sorting in low-income countries (much of which probably ends up as landfill, creating pollution and damaging local ecosystems).

The inspiration for this episode came from Dr Megan O’Connor, the founder and CEO of Nth Cycle, back in ep 67. I was struck by how clearly Megan described all the different pain points she’d identified for both the electronics sector, and for those involved in the materials for the electronics sector – both the mining companies and the recyclers.”

Podcast host Catherine Weetman is a circular economy business advisor, workshop facilitator, speaker and writer.  Her award-winning book: A Circular Economy Handbook: How to Build a More Resilient, Competitive and Sustainable Business includes lots of practical examples and tips on getting started.  Catherine founded Rethink Global in 2013, to help businesses use circular, sustainable approaches to build a better business (and a better world).

Stay in touch for free insights and updates…

Read on for a summary of the podcast and links to the people, organisations and other resources we mention.

You can subscribe to the podcast series on iTunes, Google Podcasts, PlayerFM, Spotify, TuneIn, or search for “circular economy” in your favourite podcast app.  Stay in touch to get free insights and updates, direct to your inbox…

Don’t forget, you can use our interactive, searchable podcast index to find episodes by sector, by region or by circular strategy. Plus, there is now a regular Circular Economy Podcast newsletter, so you get the latest episode show notes, links and transcript delivered to your inbox on Sunday morning, each fortnight. The newsletter includes a link to the episode page on our website, with an audio player. You can subscribe by clicking this link to update your preferences.

Links we mention in the episode:

Interview Transcript

Catherine Weetman 

Welcome back, it’s ep 70, and if you’re new to this podcast, thanks for downloading!

Today’s episode is one of my regular round ups of the last 9 conversations. Today, I’ve chosen the theme of customer Pain Points. We’ll look at this from the perspective of both businesses, and citizens – you and me. I think some of those pain points are being overlooked by companies – that could be because they have a one-size-fits-all approach that might create value for one customer group, but doesn’t deliver, or could actually destroy value for another group.

I also think new pain points are cropping up – maybe even evolving. More of us are realising that our choices aren’t contributing to a fairer, healthier and more sustainable world, and that’s making us uncomfortable, at a conscious or a sub-conscious level. Knowing that we’re going to discard something because there isn’t a convenient way to help it be reused is also uncomfortable – and we’re finding that some of our assumptions are wrong.

For example, in ep69, Jo Godden of RubyMoon explained that in the UK, hardly any textiles are recycled. A small proportion is downcycled into wadding and seat fillings, some are exported for hand-sorting in low-income countries (much of which probably ends up as landfill, creating pollution and damaging local ecosystems).

The inspiration for this episode came from Dr Megan O’Connor, the founder and CEO of Nth Cycle, back in ep 67. I was struck by how clearly Megan described all the different pain points she’d identified for both the electronics sector, and for those involved in the materials for the electronics sector – both the mining companies and the recyclers.

Megan O’Connor, Nth Cycle

And, you know, my passion really expanded from there, when I was able to attend this summit called the green electronics summit when I was up at Yale University. And a professor had invited, you know, some of the folks from Apple, Dell, Intel, Samsung, at the the major electronics manufacturers and semiconductor manufacturers you can think of around the world, they were invited to Yale to talk about the major sustainability issues they saw coming over the next five to 10 years, you know, with their corporate hats on. […] And so I begged my way. And it took me about three weeks to convince the professor that I should be in this meeting. So he finally led me in as a scribe to take notes. And it was amazing, just being like a fly on the wall and listening to all of these, you know, corporate folks talk about, you know, recycling, right, recycling kept coming up over and over again, waste management was an issue, they knew it was going to continue to be an issue as more folks get new phones every year, and TVs come out and right, it’s just a larger form of electronics waste, which a lot of people don’t necessarily think of them in that way. And paired with that, you know, waste management issue, no current recycling technologies was the issue that we have with the critical minerals supply chain, right, everybody saw the shortage of cobalt and nickel and rare earth metals coming down the pipeline. You know, by 2030, there’s predicted to be a 50% supply shortage for cobalt alone. And so they were thinking, how are we going to, you know, both recycle these materials in an efficient way. And while also creating a new supply of these materials, enough so that we don’t have to slow down in terms of our development for the clean energy economy. And so I walked out of that meeting and really thought, you know, I think I could try and at least develop a technology to solve this issue. You know, can we create a very economical way to pull these materials out in a form that can be simply put back into the supply chain to create that secondary source that was sort of the other pain point they discussed.

Catherine Weetman 

I was really impressed with Megan’s singleminded focus, picking up all the ‘pain points’ related to recovering critical materials from tech products. Firstly, the gap in effective recycling processes for the growing quantities of tech and the difficulty in converting the materials back into feedstocks – resources – that are suitable to go back into the tech supply chain.

Logistics is a pain point for recyclers – how to ensure safe and cost-effective collection of materials, and organise flows of similar materials into each recycling location.  The safety and security issues – especially for lithium – mean it’s difficult and expensive for recyclers to consolidate the material streams to create a viable ‘critical mass’, especially if they also need expensive equipment for the recycling itself. So Nth Cycle’s low-cost equipment that doesn’t need much space is an ideal solution.

Megan described another pain point for recyclers – the variability in the make-up of recycling flows. Even if you’re just processing cellphones, the materials in the different brands and ages of the phones will vary. That makes it difficult for the recyclers to set their systems up to deal with that variability, and it means the end product – the recyclate – won’t be consistent. That can detract from its value and limit the potential markets.

Megan tells us that the Nth Cycle processes can handle that variability and produce a very consistent end-product. So that’s better quality recyclate and it improves the ease of sales and profitability for the recyclers. That could lower the barriers to entry, bring more recyclers in more countries into the market, and increase the amount of e-waste we can process globally. It might make urban mining more viable too – recovering waste tech from landfill to extract the valuable minerals. If you’ve seen one of my presentations, you might remember the quiz on gold mining extraction rates….

Back in Ep 61, we heard from Astrid Wynne, Sustainability Lead of global sustainable IT solutions provider Techbuyer, which provides refurbished enterprise servers and storage. Reliability of equipment, whether it’s a laptop or a company server, is a major factor in the buying criteria for IT departments in companies of all shapes and sizes. Astrid told us about the collaborative research projects she’s been involved in, to properly assess reliability. That research found that refurbished IT is at least as reliable as new models – possibly because of the extra testing involved. Mass produced equipment might only be batch-tested, whereas refurbished, repaired or remanufactured products are likely to be tested individually, against a range of criteria.

In Ep64, I spoke to Pierre-Emmanuel Saint-Esprit, the co-founder of ZACK, France’s leading company enabling the second life of electronic products, through recycling, repair, resale and donation. In 2020, ZACK was named as one of the top 3 French circular companies.

Pierre-Emmanuel had noticed several pain points related to disposal of IT for companies in France. They could see it was creating e-waste and leading to pollution, and that many of the IT products might be suitable for reuse, repair and refurbishment, rather than being wasted. Companies want to reduce their GHG emissions too, and to include positive actions in their CSR reports. ZACK helps close the loop on these end-of-use IT products, providing traceability and numbers to show what positive impacts have been achieved.

And in Ep 62, we were given a mini design masterclass Malin Oreback, who is leading McKinsey Design’s work in sustainability and circular economy. Malin offered us so many insights into how to engage users, and described ways to set up tests, so you can discover how people will REALLY use the product or service, on both good and bad days.

Often, people don’t realise how they actually interact with objects – it can just be part of an , sub-conscious habit. Or, if it’s something new, how people imagine they might use the object or service isn’t what happens in real life. My conversation with Malin is one of our most listened-to episodes, with lots of great tips on how to design both products and services.

So, we’ve touched on a few pain points for business customers – what about all of us as citizens (I’m trying to avoid calling us consumers… I’d rather think of us as being caring, concerned citizens.)

We’re seeing a growing shift towards ‘sustainability first’, with more people asking questions about the way we live, and challenging the ‘consumption’ habits we’re encouraged to adopt. Many of us are realising that much of our consumption seems to benefit big businesses and government GDP targets, rather than actually improving our lives. And, worse still, most of our consumption isn’t helping communities and nature to thrive.

One of my of my original circular economy heroes is Kresse Wesling, founder of Elvis and Kresse, which transforms discarded materials into innovative lifestyle products. I’d met Kresse when she spoke at a conference in 2015, and asked if I could use her handwritten slide, showing her criteria for the perfect product, for my Circular Economy Handbook. It was fantastic to have another conversation with Kresse, in Ep 68, and I asked whether she’d changed anything on that original perfect product checklist.

Kresse Wesling

I think what’s fascinating about about it is that we still use, we basically, you know, I still have that that slip of paper. And I still in pretty much every presentation I give us that slide because it is it is to me the benchmark for any new good. So the the key elements for us is that it has to be designed for deconstruction. So IE designed with death in mind. And for us that meant it would be circular. We thought it had to be component based, like Lego. And the reason I said like Legos because everybody gets what Lego is so it, it makes it suddenly unknowable thing, you know, how are you going to build that house? I’m going to build it like Lego, how are you going to build that plane, I’m going to build it like Lego then. Then people sort of start to think Yep, that’s what design deconstruction means. We also felt like it needed to be swappable, shareable, engaging. Because we were we were talking you know, we don’t work in the b2b space, we work in the b2c space. So we wanted this to be fun for people. And we wanted it to, we wanted other people to feel like it belonged to them. Because crucially, there’s been all these studies done around the longevity of items. And if people feel engaged in the CO creation of an item, they’re much more likely to hang on to it for the long term. So that was the, I suppose the last thing on that slide was something about it having a life of its own. And this is really, this is really wild, I suppose, especially in the design world, or in the creative sector, where people revere designers, and how genius and wonderful they are. Well in the circular economy world. What you if you design like this for deconstruction, what you’re saying from day one, is that someone else at some other time in the future, may be able to do something better than this, with this than I can do right now. It’s not about the designer anymore. It’s not about ego. It’s just about enablement, and engagement. And the only other thing I would add to this slide really is that everything has to be regenerative. Because it isn’t enough just to be sustainable at the at the very low, low place we are with respect to people and climate. It we need to be giving back more than we’re taking now.

Catherine Weetman 

We got a bit scientific in Ep 65. Charlotte Morley, founder of childrens’ wear rental company thelittleloop, explained the relevance of Hertzberg’s ‘hygiene factors’. Frederick Herzberg was a 20th Century American psychologist who became one of the most influential names in business management, famous for introducing job enrichment and the Motivator-Hygiene theory.

Let’s have a listen back to our conversation in Ep 65:

Catherine Weetman

…For childrens wear, Charlotte said it has to be high quality, it has to be great value. And it has to be convenient. So you have to meet those criteria first, and then all those people wanting to be green will consider Which brand is the more sustainable and use that to inform their choice. This is a new kind of service one that’s evolving and disruptive. It’s crucial to keep learning more about why people want to rent and to avoid potential distractions in trying to meet a wide range of other customer requirements.

Charlotte Morley

I mean, children’s wear is different from other other clothing. But every single parent that we’ve spoken to has given us the same what we call the hygiene factors. So with children’s wear, it has to be high quality, it has to be great value, and it has to be convenient. And we tend to put style under qualities like a subheading, so for us quality is comfort, style washability design and you know, has it got poppers in the right places, etc. So we put all of that under quality, but then value and convenience, and I think I think a lot of people go into sustainable business thinking they just need to be sustainable. And what we learned very quickly and actually kind of knew anyway, but was that you have to meet the hygiene factors, before sustainability starts to kick in, you know, there are very few consumers out there who will buy something just because it’s sustainable, if it doesn’t meet those basic needs, and so that’s, you know, that’s where we’ve started, we’ve tried to meet those three needs before the sustainability then you know, has it has an opportunity to become a benefit, if you like. And I think it’s probably fair to say that there aren’t many other sustainable certainly children’s wear options, which meet all three of those. So there tends to be a compromise somewhere. So like peer to peer resale is great, but it’s not very convenient, it’s very time consuming. It’s a hassle.

I have one fabulous customer. She’s one of our brand ambassadors, and she lives in a caravan on like a comm

Total Play: 0