|
The Hockey Canada verdicts are final, but the story isn’t. In Part 2, Kristi Lee looks closely at the most talked-about evidence, how it was reflected in the written decision, and how that shaped public opinion. Thanks for your patience!
In this episode: - The flaws in the first police investigation - and why it didn't result in charges
- Michael McLeod's instagram exchange with EM the day after the hotel room incident
- The "group chat" six days later that appears to show the hockey players trying to get their stories straight
- The series of debacles that resulted in this jury trial switching to judge-alone
- Survivors JB and Kelly Favro return to share their perspectives about watching this case unfold not only as survivors — but also as massive hockey fans.
Content Warning: Details of sexual acts.
PLEASE NOTE: This series does not dispute the judge’s verdicts. Instead, it highlights a deeper truth: contradictions and inconsistencies existed on both sides, yet the accused players’ accounts were overwhelmingly accepted while the victim-complainant's was dismissed as “not credible or reliable.” Regardless of verdicts, our position is that this framing was both unnecessary and harmful — and its impact reaches far beyond the trial itself.
This is a three part series. Coming up in Part 3: - Piecing together what happened in Room 209 - and how it was reflected in the court's written decision
- The alleged "slap" and other specific incidents
- Brett Howden's controversial testimony
- Other sexual assault allegations
- And more...
More information and resources:
Let us know what you think! Follow Canadian True Crime on Facebook and Instagram
Full list of resources, information sources, and more: www.canadiantruecrime.ca/episodes
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information. |