#206: We live in a society that values career specialization.
You’re not a “doctor” -- you’re a pediatrician, an anesthesiologist, an oncologist.
You’re not a “lawyer” -- you practice family law, or bankruptcy, or criminal law.
You’re not an “engineer” -- you’re an electrical engineer who specializes in solar technologies, or a civil engineer who specializes in the application of artificial intelligence in highway traffic design.
Specialization is beneficial and necessary, but specializing too early in life or too narrowly can also have drawbacks. According to today’s podcast guest, New York Times bestselling author David Epstein, overspecialization can stifle innovation if we’re all digging in parallel trenches. Sampling a broad range of subjects prior to specializing (e.g. at the undergraduate level, or as a hobby) allows people to make connections between far-flung domains and ideas.
If you’re an athlete, spend your childhood playing a variety of sports before you commit to the one you’d like to develop.
If you’re a musician, try learning different instruments before you pick your primary focus.
If you’re bound for a graduate degree in a STEM field, consider a multidisciplinary undergraduate that pulls from chemistry, physics, biology and perhaps even art. Specialization can come later.
We hear stories of people who specialized early in life. Tiger Woods won his first golf competition at age two, beating everyone in the age-10-and-under category. Many world chess champions started training in early childhood. The notion is that early specialization provides a headstart; if you haven’t started training at chess or golf by age 12, it might be too late.
But chess and golf are limited in their scope. They’re contained games with fixed, predictable rules.
In the wider world, in which challenges and assumptions fluctuate and problems are ill-defined, being a generalist is a lifehack.
For more information, visit the show notes at https://affordanything.com/episode206